Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0 edgeFENiX 2.0
$129
POTV Lobo
$160
FENiX 2.0 is typically around $31 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
FENiX 2.0
POTV Lobo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
FENiX 2.0 and POTV Lobo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. FENiX 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $129, around $31 below POTV Lobo. FENiX 2.0 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
19
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
FENiX 2.0
$129
POTV Lobo
$160
FENiX 2.0 is typically around $31 lower.
FENiX 2.0
<30 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
FENiX 2.0 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
POTV Lobo is the lighter listed unit.
FENiX 2.0
Convection
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
FENiX 2.0
$129
POTV Lobo
$160
Heating Type
FENiX 2.0
Convection
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
FENiX 2.0
<30 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
FENiX 2.0
—
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Battery Type
FENiX 2.0
—
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Capacity
FENiX 2.0
4400 mAh
POTV Lobo
—
Charging
FENiX 2.0
—
POTV Lobo
USB-C
Charge Time
FENiX 2.0
2.5 hours
POTV Lobo
—
Dimensions
FENiX 2.0
—
POTV Lobo
8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D
Weight
FENiX 2.0
~232 grams
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | FENiX 2.0 | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $129 | $160 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Battery Type | — | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Capacity | 4400 mAh | — |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | — |
| Dimensions | — | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight | ~232 grams | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment | — | Digital (LCD) |
| Brand | — | Planet of the Vapes |
| Battery Runtime | — | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Chamber Material | Removable titanium | — |
| Concentrates | — | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Display Type | 0.95 inch OLED | — |
| Manufacturer | South Reed Technology Co | — |
| Warranty | — | 2 years through POTV |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: FENiX 2.0 runs convection while POTV Lobo runs dynamic hybrid. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
FENiX 2.0 is the cheaper option at $129 compared with $160 for the POTV Lobo, about $31 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
FENiX 2.0 reaches session-ready temperature in <30 seconds, while the POTV Lobo takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the FENiX 2.0, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
FENiX 2.0 uses convection heating, while the POTV Lobo uses dynamic hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
POTV Lobo is the lighter unit at 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem, around 82g less than the FENiX 2.0 at ~232 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.