Price (USD)
NXT E-Nano edgeNXT E-Nano
$210
Linx Apollo
$260
NXT E-Nano is typically around $50 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
NXT E-Nano
Epickai $210
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
NXT E-Nano and Linx Apollo solve similar use-cases with different tradeoffs. NXT E-Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $210, around $50 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
NXT E-Nano
$210
Linx Apollo
$260
NXT E-Nano is typically around $50 lower.
NXT E-Nano
~125g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
NXT E-Nano is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
NXT E-Nano
$210
Linx Apollo
$260
Device Type
NXT E-Nano
Desktop
Linx Apollo
Portable
Temperature Range
NXT E-Nano
0-560°F
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
NXT E-Nano
0.02g - 0.25g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
NXT E-Nano
N/A
Linx Apollo
Internal
Charging
NXT E-Nano
N/A
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Dimensions
NXT E-Nano
95x51x51mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
NXT E-Nano
~125g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
NXT E-Nano
Rotary Knob
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
NXT E-Nano
Glass
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | NXT E-Nano | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $210 | $260 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | 2 Minutes | — |
| Temperature Range | 0-560°F | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.02g - 0.25g | N/A |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 95x51x51mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~125g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Rotary Knob | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Epickai | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | — |
| Power Cable Length | 2.5 Metres | — |
| Power Source | AC Power (110v) | — |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. NXT E-Nano is a desktop, Linx Apollo is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
NXT E-Nano is the cheaper option at $210 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $50 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
NXT E-Nano is the lighter unit at ~125g, around 25g less than the Linx Apollo at 150 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Apollo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the NXT E-Nano is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
NXT E-Nano lists a chamber capacity of 0.02g - 0.25g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
NXT E-Nano covers 0-560°F, a wider band than the Linx Apollo at 220°F - 428°F. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
NXT E-Nano is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.