Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Pro edgeDaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX V3 Pro
$110
XMAX V3 Pro is typically around $89 lower.
VS
DaVinci IQC vs XMAX V3 Pro
Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
DaVinci IQC and XMAX V3 Pro are both portable / battery swap vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Pro is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $89 below DaVinci IQC. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
27
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
PortableBattery SwapElectronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close / ContextualDaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
XMAX V3 Pro edgeDaVinci IQC
~160g
XMAX V3 Pro
105 grams
XMAX V3 Pro is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close / ContextualDaVinci IQC
Conduction
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX V3 Pro
$110
Heating Type
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Heat Up Time
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Temperature Range
DaVinci IQC
Up to 221°C
XMAX V3 Pro
100 - 220C (212 - 428F)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci IQC
~0.5g
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Battery Type
DaVinci IQC
Removable 18650 battery
XMAX V3 Pro
18650 (user replaceable)
Battery Life
DaVinci IQC
~1 hour
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Charging
DaVinci IQC
USB-C
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Charge Time
DaVinci IQC
~2 hours
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Pass-Through Charging
DaVinci IQC
No
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Choose DaVinci IQC if...
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and concentrates sessions.
- You prefer DaVinci IQC's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose XMAX V3 Pro if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($110 vs $199).
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward convection and budget sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (27 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | DaVinci IQC | XMAX V3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $199 | $110 |
| Heating Type diff | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | Up to 221°C | 100 - 220C (212 - 428F) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | ~0.5g | — |
| Battery Type diff | Removable 18650 battery | 18650 (user replaceable) |
| Battery Life diff | ~1 hour | — |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time diff | ~2 hours | — |
| Pass-Through Charging diff | No | — |
| Dimensions diff | 92x45x25mm | — |
| Width diff | — | 2.5cm |
| Height diff | — | 15cm |
| Weight diff | ~160g | 105 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Digital Control | — |
| Oven Type diff | Ceramic | — |
| Brand diff | DaVinci Tech | — |
| Capacity diff | — | 0.1g - 0.15g |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Heating Element diff | — | Ceramic |
| Heating Time diff | ~60 seconds | 15-30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name diff | — | V3 Pro Vaporizer |
| Run Time diff | — | 30-45 minutes or 5-6 sessions |
| Thickness diff | — | 2.3cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Comparison FAQs
Is DaVinci IQC better than XMAX V3 Pro?
Neither is universally better. DaVinci IQC fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Pro fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Which is cheaper: DaVinci IQC or XMAX V3 Pro?
XMAX V3 Pro is listed lower ($110) compared with DaVinci IQC ($199), but live retailer pricing can change.
Which heats up faster between DaVinci IQC and XMAX V3 Pro?
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Need a Different Matchup?
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.