Price (USD)
POTV Lobo edgeDaVinci IQC
$199
POTV Lobo
$160
POTV Lobo is typically around $39 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci IQC
DaVinci Tech $199
POTV Lobo
Planet of the Vapes $160
DaVinci IQC and POTV Lobo are both portable / battery swap vaporizers, but they target different priorities. POTV Lobo is usually the lower-cost pick at $160, around $39 below DaVinci IQC. DaVinci IQC has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci IQC
$199
POTV Lobo
$160
POTV Lobo is typically around $39 lower.
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
DaVinci IQC has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci IQC
~160g
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
POTV Lobo is the lighter listed unit.
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC
$199
POTV Lobo
$160
Heating Type
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci IQC
Up to 221°C
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci IQC
~0.5g
POTV Lobo
0.2g
Battery Type
DaVinci IQC
Removable 18650 battery
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Life
DaVinci IQC
~1 hour
POTV Lobo
Up to ~10 sessions per charge
Dimensions
DaVinci IQC
92x45x25mm
POTV Lobo
8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D
Weight
DaVinci IQC
~160g
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Power Adjustment
DaVinci IQC
Digital Control
POTV Lobo
Digital (LCD)
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci IQC | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $199 | $160 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | Up to 221°C | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | 0.2g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18650 battery | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Capacity | 3000mAh | — |
| Battery Life | ~1 hour | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 92x45x25mm | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight | ~160g | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Digital (LCD) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Titanium |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | Planet of the Vapes |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 5 years | 2 years through POTV |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: DaVinci IQC runs conduction while POTV Lobo runs dynamic hybrid. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
POTV Lobo is the cheaper option at $160 compared with $199 for the DaVinci IQC, about $39 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
DaVinci IQC reaches session-ready temperature in ~30 seconds, while the POTV Lobo takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the DaVinci IQC, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
DaVinci IQC uses conduction heating, while the POTV Lobo uses dynamic hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
DaVinci IQC has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus 0.2g on the POTV Lobo. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
DaVinci IQC's spec sheet lists ~1 hour; the POTV Lobo lists Up to ~10 sessions per charge. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.