Price (USD)
Boundless CFC 2.0 edgeBoundless CFC 2.0
$90
Linx Apollo
$260
Boundless CFC 2.0 is typically around $170 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Boundless CFC 2.0 vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Boundless CFC 2.0
Boundless Technology $90
VS
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Editorial Summary
Boundless CFC 2.0 and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Boundless CFC 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $170 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weight
Boundless CFC 2.0 edgeBoundless CFC 2.0
~85g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Boundless CFC 2.0
$90
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
Boundless CFC 2.0
60°C-230°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Boundless CFC 2.0
~0.5g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Boundless CFC 2.0
Swappable 18650
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Life
Boundless CFC 2.0
12-14 sessions
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charge Time
Boundless CFC 2.0
~3 hours
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
Boundless CFC 2.0
130x33x30mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Boundless CFC 2.0
~85g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
Boundless CFC 2.0
Digital
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
Boundless CFC 2.0
Ceramic
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Choose Boundless CFC 2.0 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($90 vs $260).
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward discrete and budget sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
19 differ 3 shared
| Specification | Boundless CFC 2.0 | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 60°C-230°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Swappable 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 12-14 sessions | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 130x33x30mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~85g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Boundless Technology | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Release Date | 2018 | — |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Boundless CFC 2.0 and the Linx Apollo?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Boundless CFC 2.0 sits at $90 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $170 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the cheaper option at $90 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $170 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which is lighter, the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the lighter unit at ~85g, around 65g less than the Linx Apollo at 150 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Can I swap the batteries on the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 uses swappable 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 controls heat with digital, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Boundless CFC 2.0 gives you finer per-degree control.
How much flower do the Boundless CFC 2.0 and Linx Apollo hold?
Boundless CFC 2.0 lists a chamber capacity of ~0.5g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Which charges faster, the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 fully charges in ~3 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.