Price (USD)
Boundless CFC 2.0 edgeBoundless CFC 2.0
$90
Linx Apollo
$190
Boundless CFC 2.0 is typically around $100 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Boundless CFC 2.0 vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Boundless CFC 2.0
Boundless Technology from $59.95
VS
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
Editorial Summary
Boundless CFC 2.0 and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Boundless CFC 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $100 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Weight
Boundless CFC 2.0 edgeBoundless CFC 2.0
~85g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Boundless CFC 2.0
$90
Linx Apollo
$190
Temperature Range
Boundless CFC 2.0
60°C-230°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Boundless CFC 2.0
~0.5g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Boundless CFC 2.0
Internal 18650
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Life
Boundless CFC 2.0
12-14 sessions
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charge Time
Boundless CFC 2.0
~3 hours
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
Boundless CFC 2.0
130x33x30mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Boundless CFC 2.0
~85g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
Boundless CFC 2.0
Digital
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Chamber Material
Boundless CFC 2.0
Ceramic
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Choose Boundless CFC 2.0 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($90 vs $190).
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward discrete and budget sessions.
Current price
$59.95
at Boundless Technology
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages and were last checked Sep 3, 2026; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
19 differ 3 shared
| Specification | Boundless CFC 2.0 | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $190 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 60°C-230°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Internal 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 12-14 sessions | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 130x33x30mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~85g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Boundless Technology | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Release Date | 2018 | — |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Boundless CFC 2.0 and the Linx Apollo?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Boundless CFC 2.0 sits at $90 while the Linx Apollo is $190, a gap of about $100 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the cheaper option at $90 compared with $190 for the Linx Apollo, about $100 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which is lighter, the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the lighter unit at ~85g, around 65g less than the Linx Apollo at 150 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 controls heat with digital, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Boundless CFC 2.0 gives you finer per-degree control.
How much flower do the Boundless CFC 2.0 and Linx Apollo hold?
Boundless CFC 2.0 lists a chamber capacity of ~0.5g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Which charges faster, the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 fully charges in ~3 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Which is more discreet, the Boundless CFC 2.0 or the Linx Apollo?
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Linx Apollo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.