Price (USD)
Close / ContextualAUXO Calent
$120
XMAX V3 Pro
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Calent and XMAX V3 Pro are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($120 vs $110). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
31
Different Specs
31
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Calent
$120
XMAX V3 Pro
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
AUXO Calent
~30 seconds
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Calent
—
XMAX V3 Pro
105 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Calent
$120
XMAX V3 Pro
$110
Device Type
AUXO Calent
Portable
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Heating Type
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Heat Up Time
AUXO Calent
~30 seconds
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Temperature Range
AUXO Calent
—
XMAX V3 Pro
100 - 220C (212 - 428F)
Battery Type
AUXO Calent
—
XMAX V3 Pro
18650 (user replaceable)
Battery Capacity
AUXO Calent
2900mAh
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Charging
AUXO Calent
USB-C
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Charge Time
AUXO Calent
2.5 hours
XMAX V3 Pro
—
Width
AUXO Calent
—
XMAX V3 Pro
2.5cm
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (31 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Calent | XMAX V3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $120 | $110 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 100 - 220C (212 - 428F) |
| Battery Type diff | — | 18650 (user replaceable) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 2900mAh | — |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time diff | 2.5 hours | — |
| Width diff | — | 2.5cm |
| Height diff | — | 15cm |
| Weight diff | — | 105 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages | — |
| Oven Type diff | Stainless Steel | — |
| Brand diff | AUXO | — |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g | 0.1g - 0.15g |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Concentrate Support diff | No | — |
| Haptic Feedback diff | Yes | — |
| Heating Element diff | — | Ceramic |
| Heating Time diff | — | 15-30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Name diff | — | V3 Pro Vaporizer |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Run Time diff | — | 30-45 minutes or 5-6 sessions |
| Thickness diff | — | 2.3cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Calent fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Pro fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Pro is listed lower ($110) compared with AUXO Calent ($120), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.