Price (USD)
Atmos Jump edgeAtmos Jump
$65
POTV Lobo
$160
Atmos Jump is typically around $95 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Atmos Jump
POTV Lobo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump and POTV Lobo are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Atmos Jump is usually the lower-cost pick at $65, around $95 below POTV Lobo. POTV Lobo has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
19
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
POTV Lobo
$160
Atmos Jump is typically around $95 lower.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
POTV Lobo has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Atmos Jump
—
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Atmos Jump
Convection
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
POTV Lobo
$160
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
—
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
—
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
POTV Lobo
—
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
POTV Lobo
USB-C
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
POTV Lobo
—
Dimensions
Atmos Jump
145x17mm
POTV Lobo
8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D
Weight
Atmos Jump
—
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $160 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Battery Type | — | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight | — | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | Digital (LCD) |
| Oven Type | Stainless Steel | — |
| Brand | AtmosRx | Planet of the Vapes |
| Battery Runtime | — | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | ~0.2g | — |
| Concentrates | — | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Warranty | — | 2 years through POTV |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Atmos Jump runs convection while POTV Lobo runs dynamic hybrid. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Atmos Jump is the cheaper option at $65 compared with $160 for the POTV Lobo, about $95 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
POTV Lobo reaches session-ready temperature in ~40 seconds, while the Atmos Jump takes ~60 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the POTV Lobo, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Atmos Jump uses convection heating, while the POTV Lobo uses dynamic hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Atmos Jump controls heat with modular, while the POTV Lobo uses digital (lcd). POTV Lobo gives you finer per-degree control.
Atmos Jump is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the POTV Lobo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
POTV Lobo charges over USB-C; the Atmos Jump uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.