Price (USD)
Close callArizer Solo 2 Max
$269
Linx Apollo
$260
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo 2 Max
Arizer $269
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Arizer Solo 2 Max and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($269 vs $260). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo 2 Max
$269
Linx Apollo
$260
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Arizer Solo 2 Max
~210g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo 2 Max
$269
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo 2 Max
50°C-220°C
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Solo 2 Max
0.3g
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
Arizer Solo 2 Max
Internal Dual 18650 (non-swappable)
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Life
Arizer Solo 2 Max
~3 hours
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
Arizer Solo 2 Max
USB-C
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
Arizer Solo 2 Max
~3 hours
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
Arizer Solo 2 Max
114x45x35mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
Arizer Solo 2 Max
~210g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
Arizer Solo 2 Max
Digital
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo 2 Max | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $269 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-220°C | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Internal Dual 18650 (non-swappable) | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~3 hours | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Dimensions | 114x45x35mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | ~210g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Arizer | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 20 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 60g less than the Arizer Solo 2 Max at ~210g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Listed prices are close: $269 for the Arizer Solo 2 Max versus $260 for the Linx Apollo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Arizer Solo 2 Max controls heat with digital, while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. Arizer Solo 2 Max gives you finer per-degree control.
Arizer Solo 2 Max lists a chamber capacity of 0.3g; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
Arizer Solo 2 Max fully charges in ~3 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Arizer Solo 2 Max's spec sheet lists ~3 hours; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.