Price (USD)
Close callArizer Extreme Q
$160
POTV Lobo
$160
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Arizer Extreme Q vs POTV Lobo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Extreme Q
Arizer $160
VS
POTV Lobo
Planet of the Vapes $160
Editorial Summary
Arizer Extreme Q and POTV Lobo are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($160 vs $160). POTV Lobo has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
POTV Lobo edgeArizer Extreme Q
2-3 minutes
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
POTV Lobo has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Weight
POTV Lobo edgeArizer Extreme Q
442g
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
POTV Lobo is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close callArizer Extreme Q
Convection
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Device Type
Arizer Extreme Q
Desktop
POTV Lobo
Portable
Heating Type
Arizer Extreme Q
Convection
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
Arizer Extreme Q
2-3 minutes
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Extreme Q
50°C-250°C
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Extreme Q
~0.7g
POTV Lobo
0.2g
Battery Type
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Charging
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
POTV Lobo
USB-C
Dimensions
Arizer Extreme Q
160x160x65mm
POTV Lobo
8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D
Weight
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Power Adjustment
Arizer Extreme Q
Digital Control
POTV Lobo
Digital (LCD)
Choose Arizer Extreme Q if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
- You prefer Arizer Extreme Q's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose POTV Lobo if...
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a dynamic hybrid heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and hybrid sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
21 differ 1 shared
| Specification | Arizer Extreme Q | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $160 | $160 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time | 2-3 minutes | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-250°C | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.7g | 0.2g |
| Battery Type | N/A | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Life | — | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Dimensions | 160x160x65mm | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight | 442g | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Digital (LCD) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Titanium |
| Concentrate Support | — | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Brand | Arizer | Planet of the Vapes |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2023 |
| Remote Control | Yes | — |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 3 years | 2 years through POTV |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Arizer Extreme Q and the POTV Lobo?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Arizer Extreme Q is a desktop, POTV Lobo is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which heats up faster, the Arizer Extreme Q or the POTV Lobo?
POTV Lobo reaches session-ready temperature in ~40 seconds, while the Arizer Extreme Q takes 2-3 minutes. That's roughly 110 seconds quicker on the POTV Lobo, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the Arizer Extreme Q and the POTV Lobo?
Arizer Extreme Q uses convection heating, while the POTV Lobo uses dynamic hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Does the Arizer Extreme Q or the POTV Lobo hold more flower?
Arizer Extreme Q has the larger chamber at ~0.7g, versus 0.2g on the POTV Lobo. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Which is lighter, the Arizer Extreme Q or the POTV Lobo?
POTV Lobo is the lighter unit at 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem, around 292g less than the Arizer Extreme Q at 442g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Is the Arizer Extreme Q or the POTV Lobo better for home versus on-the-go use?
POTV Lobo is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Arizer Extreme Q is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Which is cheaper, the Arizer Extreme Q or the POTV Lobo?
Listed prices are close: $160 for the Arizer Extreme Q versus $160 for the POTV Lobo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.