Price (USD)
Sticky Brick Junior edgeSticky Brick Junior
$150
The Coma
$588
Sticky Brick Junior is typically around $438 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Sticky Brick Junior
Sticky Brick Labs $150
The Coma
Vices $588
Sticky Brick Junior and The Coma are both convection vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Sticky Brick Junior is usually the lower-cost pick at $150, around $438 below The Coma. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
15%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Sticky Brick Junior
$150
The Coma
$588
Sticky Brick Junior is typically around $438 lower.
Sticky Brick Junior
Convection
The Coma
Convection (wired ball vaporizer)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Sticky Brick Junior
$150
The Coma
$588
Device Type
Sticky Brick Junior
Portable
The Coma
Desktop
Heating Type
Sticky Brick Junior
Convection
The Coma
Convection (wired ball vaporizer)
Temperature Range
Sticky Brick Junior
N/A
The Coma
200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices
Chamber Capacity
Sticky Brick Junior
~0.2g
The Coma
0.2g to 1.6g
Power Adjustment
Sticky Brick Junior
Manual
The Coma
PID controller, switchable between °C and °F
Brand
Sticky Brick Junior
Sticky Brick Labs
The Coma
Vices
Release Date
Sticky Brick Junior
2019
The Coma
2026
Warranty
Sticky Brick Junior
Lifetime
The Coma
Australian Consumer Law cover, no fixed term published. Consumables excluded
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Sticky Brick Junior | The Coma |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $150 | $588 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | Convection | Convection (wired ball vaporizer) |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | 0.2g to 1.6g |
| Battery Type | None | None |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | N/A |
| Battery Life | N/A | — |
| Charging | N/A | N/A |
| Charge Time | N/A | — |
| Dimensions | 114x76x25mm | — |
| Weight | 190g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | PID controller, switchable between °C and °F |
| Chamber Material | — | Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen |
| Brand | Sticky Brick Labs | Vices |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Coil Size | — | 35mm enclosed coil, wired directly to the PID |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | — |
| Heater Material | — | Titanium with an aluminium handle and heat sync hardware |
| Manufacturer | — | Vices, Brisbane Australia |
| Power Options | — | 110V (US and Canada) or 220V (AU, UK and EU) |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2026 |
| Session Style | On-Demand | On-Demand |
| Thermal Matrix | — | ~3500 mixed cut ruby corundum gems, 2 to 2.5mm |
| Warranty | Lifetime | Australian Consumer Law cover, no fixed term published. Consumables excluded |
| Water Pipe Adapter | — | 14mm glass joint fitted, 18mm spare included |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Sticky Brick Junior sits at $150 while the The Coma is $588, a gap of about $438 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Sticky Brick Junior is the cheaper option at $150 compared with $588 for the The Coma, about $438 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Sticky Brick Junior uses convection heating, while the The Coma uses convection (wired ball vaporizer). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
The Coma has the larger chamber at 0.2g to 1.6g, versus ~0.2g on the Sticky Brick Junior. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Sticky Brick Junior is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the The Coma is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Across the 26 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 22, an overlap of about 15%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.