Price (USD)
POTV Lobo edgeFocus V Carta Classic
$200
POTV Lobo
$160
POTV Lobo is typically around $40 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Focus V Carta Classic
Focus V $200
POTV Lobo
Planet of the Vapes $160
Focus V Carta Classic and POTV Lobo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. POTV Lobo is usually the lower-cost pick at $160, around $40 below Focus V Carta Classic. Focus V Carta Classic has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
19%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Focus V Carta Classic
$200
POTV Lobo
$160
POTV Lobo is typically around $40 lower.
Focus V Carta Classic
~10 Seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Focus V Carta Classic has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Focus V Carta Classic
Conduction
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Focus V Carta Classic
$200
POTV Lobo
$160
Heating Type
Focus V Carta Classic
Conduction
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time
Focus V Carta Classic
~10 Seconds
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
Focus V Carta Classic
600°F - 940°F
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
Battery Type
Focus V Carta Classic
2x 18350 Batteries
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Life
Focus V Carta Classic
~40-50 sessions
POTV Lobo
Up to ~10 sessions per charge
Power Adjustment
Focus V Carta Classic
Modular - 4 Stages or Precision Control via App
POTV Lobo
Digital (LCD)
Chamber Material
Focus V Carta Classic
Ceramic
POTV Lobo
Titanium
Concentrate Support
Focus V Carta Classic
Yes
POTV Lobo
Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts)
Brand
Focus V Carta Classic
Focus V
POTV Lobo
Planet of the Vapes
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Focus V Carta Classic | POTV Lobo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $200 | $160 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Dynamic Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time | ~10 Seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 600°F - 940°F | 160-221°C (320-430°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.2g |
| Battery Type | 2x 18350 Batteries | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) |
| Battery Capacity | 2400mAh (1200mAh x 2) | — |
| Battery Life | ~40-50 sessions | Up to ~10 sessions per charge |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 Hours | — |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | — | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D |
| Weight | — | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages or Precision Control via App | Digital (LCD) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Titanium |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) |
| Brand | Focus V | Planet of the Vapes |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 2 years through POTV |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Focus V Carta Classic runs conduction while POTV Lobo runs dynamic hybrid. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
POTV Lobo is the cheaper option at $160 compared with $200 for the Focus V Carta Classic, about $40 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Focus V Carta Classic reaches session-ready temperature in ~10 Seconds, while the POTV Lobo takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 30 seconds quicker on the Focus V Carta Classic, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Focus V Carta Classic uses conduction heating, while the POTV Lobo uses dynamic hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Focus V Carta Classic's spec sheet lists ~40-50 sessions; the POTV Lobo lists Up to ~10 sessions per charge. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
Across the 21 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 17, an overlap of about 19%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.