Price (USD)
XMAX Riggo edgeAUXO Cenote
$400
XMAX Riggo
$59
XMAX Riggo is typically around $341 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Cenote
AUXO $400
XMAX Riggo
XMAX from $58.95
AUXO Cenote and XMAX Riggo are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Riggo is usually the lower-cost pick at $59, around $341 below AUXO Cenote. XMAX Riggo has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
28
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
11%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Cenote
$400
XMAX Riggo
$59
XMAX Riggo is typically around $341 lower.
AUXO Cenote
~28 seconds
XMAX Riggo
~15 seconds
XMAX Riggo has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Cenote
Conduction
XMAX Riggo
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Cenote
$400
XMAX Riggo
$59
Heat Up Time
AUXO Cenote
~28 seconds
XMAX Riggo
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Cenote
200-340°C (392-644°F)
XMAX Riggo
260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F)
Battery Type
AUXO Cenote
Lithium (internal)
XMAX Riggo
Internal
Battery Capacity
AUXO Cenote
2000mAh / 7.4V
XMAX Riggo
1000mAh
Charging
AUXO Cenote
USB-C, plus Qi wireless charging
XMAX Riggo
USB-C
Power Adjustment
AUXO Cenote
3 device presets plus app controlled Pro Mode
XMAX Riggo
Modular - 5 Stages
Chamber Material
AUXO Cenote
Aluminium oxide ceramic (disposable nail)
XMAX Riggo
Quartz
Brand
AUXO Cenote
AUXO
XMAX Riggo
XMAX
Session Style
AUXO Cenote
Session (20 to 90 seconds)
XMAX Riggo
Both
Typical price
$400
Sold by The Stash Shack
Lowest price
$58.95
at VPM
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages and were last checked Aug 27, 2026; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Cenote | XMAX Riggo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $400 | $59 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~28 seconds | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 200-340°C (392-644°F) | 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | N/A |
| Battery Type | Lithium (internal) | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2000mAh / 7.4V | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | 12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions) | — |
| Charging | USB-C, plus Qi wireless charging | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes with the 20W adapter | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 143 x 95 x 56mm | — |
| Weight | 320.5g | — |
| Power Adjustment | 3 device presets plus app controlled Pro Mode | Modular - 5 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Aluminium oxide ceramic (disposable nail) | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | AUXO | XMAX |
| App Control | Yes (AUXO Connect on Android, All-On Browser on iOS) | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | None (LED light indication) | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Heating Rod Material | Stainless steel | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2022 | — |
| Session Style | Session (20 to 90 seconds) | Both |
| Warranty | 2 years on the Cenote base | 6 months |
| Water Filtration | Hand blown borosilicate glass recycler | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Riggo sits at $59 while the AUXO Cenote is $400, a gap of about $341 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Riggo is the cheaper option at $59 compared with $400 for the AUXO Cenote, about $341 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Riggo reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the AUXO Cenote takes ~28 seconds. That's roughly 13 seconds quicker on the XMAX Riggo, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
AUXO Cenote controls heat with 3 device presets plus app controlled pro mode, while the XMAX Riggo uses modular - 5 stages. AUXO Cenote gives you finer per-degree control.
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
Across the 28 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 25, an overlap of about 11%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.