Price (USD)
Tempest edgeAUXO Cenote
$400
Tempest
$247
Tempest is typically around $153 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Cenote
AUXO $400
Tempest
Mad Heaters $247
AUXO Cenote and Tempest are both portable / premium vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Tempest is usually the lower-cost pick at $247, around $153 below AUXO Cenote. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
29
Different Specs
28
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
3%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Cenote
$400
Tempest
$247
Tempest is typically around $153 lower.
AUXO Cenote
Conduction
Tempest
Convection-heavy with some conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Cenote
$400
Tempest
$247
Heating Type
AUXO Cenote
Conduction
Tempest
Convection-heavy with some conduction
Temperature Range
AUXO Cenote
200-340°C (392-644°F)
Tempest
N/A
Battery Type
AUXO Cenote
Lithium (internal)
Tempest
None
Battery Capacity
AUXO Cenote
2000mAh / 7.4V
Tempest
N/A
Battery Life
AUXO Cenote
12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions)
Tempest
N/A
Charging
AUXO Cenote
USB-C, plus Qi wireless charging
Tempest
N/A
Charge Time
AUXO Cenote
~90 minutes with the 20W adapter
Tempest
N/A
Power Adjustment
AUXO Cenote
3 device presets plus app controlled Pro Mode
Tempest
Manual
Chamber Material
AUXO Cenote
Aluminium oxide ceramic (disposable nail)
Tempest
Titanium
Typical price
$400
Sold by The Stash Shack
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Cenote | Tempest |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $400 | $247 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Convection-heavy with some conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~28 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 200-340°C (392-644°F) | N/A |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.075g - 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Lithium (internal) | None |
| Battery Capacity | 2000mAh / 7.4V | N/A |
| Battery Life | 12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions) | N/A |
| Charging | USB-C, plus Qi wireless charging | N/A |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes with the 20W adapter | N/A |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 143 x 95 x 56mm | — |
| Weight | 320.5g | — |
| Power Adjustment | 3 device presets plus app controlled Pro Mode | Manual |
| Chamber Material | Aluminium oxide ceramic (disposable nail) | Titanium |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | AUXO | Mad Heaters |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| App Control | Yes (AUXO Connect on Android, All-On Browser on iOS) | — |
| Ball Size | — | 2.5mm Zirconia |
| Country of Manufacture | — | Made in China, Assembled in the UK |
| Display Type | None (LED light indication) | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Heating Rod Material | Stainless steel | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | — |
| Session Style | Session (20 to 90 seconds) | — |
| Warranty | 2 years on the Cenote base | — |
| Water Filtration | Hand blown borosilicate glass recycler | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Tempest sits at $247 while the AUXO Cenote is $400, a gap of about $153 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Tempest is the cheaper option at $247 compared with $400 for the AUXO Cenote, about $153 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AUXO Cenote uses conduction heating, while the Tempest uses convection-heavy with some conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
AUXO Cenote controls heat with 3 device presets plus app controlled pro mode, while the Tempest uses manual. AUXO Cenote gives you finer per-degree control.
AUXO Cenote's spec sheet lists 12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions); the Tempest lists N/A. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.