Skip to content

Vaporizer Comparison

AUXO Cenote vs POTV Lobo

Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.

AUXO Cenote

AUXO Cenote

AUXO $400

VS
POTV Lobo

POTV Lobo

Planet of the Vapes $160

Editorial Summary

AUXO Cenote and POTV Lobo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. POTV Lobo is usually the lower-cost pick at $160, around $240 below AUXO Cenote. AUXO Cenote has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.

Specs Compared

26

Different Specs

25

Shared Specs

1

Overall Overlap

4%

Shared Traits

Portable Electronic

Head-to-Head Highlights

A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.

Price (USD)

POTV Lobo edge

AUXO Cenote

$400

POTV Lobo

$160

POTV Lobo is typically around $240 lower.

Heat-Up Time

AUXO Cenote edge

AUXO Cenote

~28 seconds

POTV Lobo

~40 seconds

AUXO Cenote has the quicker listed heat-up profile.

Weight

POTV Lobo edge

AUXO Cenote

320.5g

POTV Lobo

150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem

POTV Lobo is the lighter listed unit.

Heating Style

Close call

AUXO Cenote

Conduction

POTV Lobo

Dynamic Hybrid

Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.

Key Differences at a Glance

Top specs where these two devices diverge.

10 differences

Price (USD)

AUXO Cenote

$400

POTV Lobo

$160

Heating Type

AUXO Cenote

Conduction

POTV Lobo

Dynamic Hybrid

Heat Up Time

AUXO Cenote

~28 seconds

POTV Lobo

~40 seconds

Temperature Range

AUXO Cenote

200-340°C (392-644°F)

POTV Lobo

160-221°C (320-430°F)

Battery Type

AUXO Cenote

Lithium (internal)

POTV Lobo

Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)

Battery Life

AUXO Cenote

12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions)

POTV Lobo

Up to ~10 sessions per charge

Charging

AUXO Cenote

USB-C, plus Qi wireless charging

POTV Lobo

USB-C

Dimensions

AUXO Cenote

143 x 95 x 56mm

POTV Lobo

8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D

Weight

AUXO Cenote

320.5g

POTV Lobo

150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem

Power Adjustment

AUXO Cenote

3 device presets plus app controlled Pro Mode

POTV Lobo

Digital (LCD)

Choose AUXO Cenote if...

  • You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
  • You prefer a conduction heating profile.
  • Your usage leans toward concentrates and conduction sessions.

Typical price

$400

Sold by The Stash Shack

Check price
View full profile

Choose POTV Lobo if...

  • You want the lower listed entry price ($160 vs $400).
  • You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
  • You prefer a dynamic hybrid heating profile.
  • Your usage leans toward hybrid and budget sessions.

Typical price

$160

Sold by To the Cloud Vapor Store

Check price
View full profile

Prices are read automatically from retailer pages; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.

Spec Comparison Table

Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.

25 differ 1 shared
SpecificationAUXO CenotePOTV Lobo
Price (USD) $400$160
Device Type PortablePortable
Heating Type ConductionDynamic Hybrid
Heat Up Time ~28 seconds~40 seconds
Temperature Range 200-340°C (392-644°F)160-221°C (320-430°F)
Chamber Capacity 0.2g
Battery Type Lithium (internal)Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
Battery Capacity 2000mAh / 7.4V
Battery Life 12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions)Up to ~10 sessions per charge
Charging USB-C, plus Qi wireless chargingUSB-C
Charge Time ~90 minutes with the 20W adapter
Pass-Through Charging No
Dimensions 143 x 95 x 56mm8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D
Weight 320.5g150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
Power Adjustment 3 device presets plus app controlled Pro ModeDigital (LCD)
Chamber Material Aluminium oxide ceramic (disposable nail)Titanium
Concentrate Support YesSupported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts)
Brand AUXOPlanet of the Vapes
App Control Yes (AUXO Connect on Android, All-On Browser on iOS)
Display Type None (LED light indication)
Haptic Feedback Yes
Heating Rod Material Stainless steel
Release Date 20222023
Session Style Session (20 to 90 seconds)Session
Warranty 2 years on the Cenote base2 years through POTV
Water Filtration Hand blown borosilicate glass recycler

Comparison FAQs

What is the biggest difference between the AUXO Cenote and the POTV Lobo?

The biggest practical difference is price tier: the POTV Lobo sits at $160 while the AUXO Cenote is $400, a gap of about $240 that puts them in different buying brackets.

Which is cheaper, the AUXO Cenote or the POTV Lobo?

POTV Lobo is the cheaper option at $160 compared with $400 for the AUXO Cenote, about $240 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.

Which heats up faster, the AUXO Cenote or the POTV Lobo?

AUXO Cenote reaches session-ready temperature in ~28 seconds, while the POTV Lobo takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 12 seconds quicker on the AUXO Cenote, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.

What's the difference in heating between the AUXO Cenote and the POTV Lobo?

AUXO Cenote uses conduction heating, while the POTV Lobo uses dynamic hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.

Which is lighter, the AUXO Cenote or the POTV Lobo?

POTV Lobo is the lighter unit at 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem, around 171g less than the AUXO Cenote at 320.5g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.

Can I swap the batteries on the AUXO Cenote or the POTV Lobo?

POTV Lobo uses samsung 35e 3500mah 8a (replaceable flat-top 18650), so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The AUXO Cenote has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.

What battery life can I expect from the AUXO Cenote and the POTV Lobo?

AUXO Cenote's spec sheet lists 12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions); the POTV Lobo lists Up to ~10 sessions per charge. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.

Need a different matchup?

Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.