Price (USD)
IOLITE 2.0 edgeAUXO Cenote
$400
IOLITE 2.0
$90
IOLITE 2.0 is typically around $310 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Cenote
AUXO $400
IOLITE 2.0
IOLITE $90
AUXO Cenote and IOLITE 2.0 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. IOLITE 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $90, around $310 below AUXO Cenote. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
7%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Cenote
$400
IOLITE 2.0
$90
IOLITE 2.0 is typically around $310 lower.
AUXO Cenote
320.5g
IOLITE 2.0
81g
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
AUXO Cenote
Conduction
IOLITE 2.0
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Cenote
$400
IOLITE 2.0
$90
Temperature Range
AUXO Cenote
200-340°C (392-644°F)
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed at 190°C (374°F)
Battery Type
AUXO Cenote
Lithium (internal)
IOLITE 2.0
None
Battery Capacity
AUXO Cenote
2000mAh / 7.4V
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Battery Life
AUXO Cenote
12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions)
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Charging
AUXO Cenote
USB-C, plus Qi wireless charging
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Charge Time
AUXO Cenote
~90 minutes with the 20W adapter
IOLITE 2.0
N/A
Dimensions
AUXO Cenote
143 x 95 x 56mm
IOLITE 2.0
102x25x64mm
Weight
AUXO Cenote
320.5g
IOLITE 2.0
81g
Power Adjustment
AUXO Cenote
3 device presets plus app controlled Pro Mode
IOLITE 2.0
Fixed
Typical price
$400
Sold by The Stash Shack
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Cenote | IOLITE 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $400 | $90 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~28 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 200-340°C (392-644°F) | Fixed at 190°C (374°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | ~0.5g |
| Battery Type | Lithium (internal) | None |
| Battery Capacity | 2000mAh / 7.4V | N/A |
| Battery Life | 12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions) | N/A |
| Charging | USB-C, plus Qi wireless charging | N/A |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes with the 20W adapter | N/A |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 143 x 95 x 56mm | 102x25x64mm |
| Weight | 320.5g | 81g |
| Power Adjustment | 3 device presets plus app controlled Pro Mode | Fixed |
| Chamber Material | Aluminium oxide ceramic (disposable nail) | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | AUXO | IOLITE |
| App Control | Yes (AUXO Connect on Android, All-On Browser on iOS) | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | Ireland |
| Display Type | None (LED light indication) | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Heating Rod Material | Stainless steel | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | — |
| Session Style | Session (20 to 90 seconds) | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years on the Cenote base | 2 years |
| Water Filtration | Hand blown borosilicate glass recycler | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the IOLITE 2.0 sits at $90 while the AUXO Cenote is $400, a gap of about $310 that puts them in different buying brackets.
IOLITE 2.0 is the cheaper option at $90 compared with $400 for the AUXO Cenote, about $310 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
IOLITE 2.0 is the lighter unit at 81g, around 240g less than the AUXO Cenote at 320.5g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
AUXO Cenote controls heat with 3 device presets plus app controlled pro mode, while the IOLITE 2.0 uses fixed. AUXO Cenote gives you finer per-degree control.
AUXO Cenote's spec sheet lists 12 sessions per charge (100 second sessions); the IOLITE 2.0 lists N/A. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Across the 27 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 25, an overlap of about 7%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.